- WHITE PAPERS
According to a new study from Maritz Research, one in four consumers believe the information available on restaurant ratings sites is unfair, and many have concerns over biased or fake reviews.
Maritz Research's 2013 Online Customer Review Study surveyed more than 3,400 people about their use of 13 high-profile ratings sites. The sites named as the most trusted include:
While older, highly visited sites were generally perceived as more trustworthy, more than one-third of visitors were still cautious of information on these sites.
"Many people we surveyed expressed concern over reviews on customer ratings sites being biased or even fake," said David Ensing, vice president of Voice of the Customer Integration for Maritz Research. "Many site visitors tend to believe that ratings sites select which reviews are posted, that employees post fake positive reviews for the companies they work for, and that raters only share their positive or negative experiences instead of sharing a balanced opinion."
For those who felt ratings sites were generally fair, many reported they still have to separate trustworthy reviews from non-trustworthy ones based on their own intuition. Specific survey respondents noted that they:
"Our research indicates that there may be a credibility crisis on the horizon for online review sites," Ensing said. "If the lack of confidence in customer reviews continues, these sites could become obsolete. To address trust issues, companies and ratings sites should consider more secure and credible ways to provide customers with reviews that have been verified and aren't skewed."
Read more about trends and statistics.